<- More.

I've been thinking about what makes the Cracky obsession so wrong to try to justify. The biggest things are obviously that she was only a kid, and that the lack of consent is a major part of (most of) our Cracky "appreciation." I'm sure if (when) Crackyfags encounter a woman or girl (shudder) photographer as talented, fair, and inviting as Olivia was (is?), they feel like she can't compare because Olivia never wanted to be the center of this kind and magnitude of attention. That's an ADMIRABLE trait somehow. And you get off on being the bad guy in that dynamic. It's wrong that we keep saying "well yeah it sucks but that's the way it is" or, worse, repeating how Olivia owes us something or that checking in would be the CONSIDERATE thing to do. I remember feeling and expressing these things, and now I'm just ashamed that I didn't see the problem with that, or didn't think it was as important as getting rares/proof of attention. It's all really wrong.

>>2
proof of life*
Sorry, ugh. Anyway, I think it's worth examining our impulses to protect vulnerability, laud fucked-upness, fetishize innocence, and take possession of cute-and-sweetness. Think about what it says about you. Think about the fact that you actively contributed to impeding somebody's emotional growth; that you wanted to define someone's identity for them.

No, sorry, this doesnt say anything about me, but I'm afraid it does say a bit too much about you.

I certainly dont get off being anything in this mostly imagined relationship of yours, I only get off (I dont think it means anything it does for you) over the pics and fanart. Never seeked rares or proof of attention/life (Freud would have something to say to that lapsus too, I'm sure).

Sorry mang, you're trying to define everybody else's personalities for them, based on your own fucked-upness. In that very sense, you're on your own.

And those pic remind me nothing of Cracky either. Well, maybe >>2...

>>2

>>2

In all seriousness I've never been like what you've described, that's ALL you and your own odd way of thinking.

>>4
Alright dude, you need to chill. Maybe the psychographic has changed a little since '07, when my oversimplified model of Crackymania would have gone pretty much unchallenged. Before you flip your shit, I'm not calling you a newfag, just recalling a time when I made generalized claims to this effect and people didn't bother to rebuke them. I'm glad that it's not like that for everyone.
>>6
I have to disagree with you on this, though. It's definitely not just me.