>>22
True. But then again, I'm not the one She spoke to directly and unequivocally.
You don't know me, and I know you to no further extent than you have been presented on this board; from the young you who posted (or had reposted) her Cracky images to the less flattering images you currently are presented with now (I guess not by yourself).
Then tell me, how am I to interpret what She spoke to you differently?
To the extent possible, I do love you, in as much as I love anyone who posts here with a pure heart, as I still believe you do.
You probably believe you're not being harmed, or are simply having a good time, or any other of the myriad excuses the mind will invent in self defence. But for one who only sees you with intermittent steps it's obvious Her words were true and compassionate:
"it's not good for you"