Oh vain, narcissistic, wanna-be-(but too lazy to be)-literate Crackyfags, wherefore can ye not be bothered to consult a standard annotated edition of "Romeo and Juliet" for high school students and learn that the word "wherefore" does not mean "where" but rather "why"?

My bad, though, if what you meant to write really WAS "Why Cracky?" - because THAT very definitely IS a question that the wandering retards who sporadically use this board DO need to ask themselves, provided it is taken to signify : "why the fuck don't you just knock it on the head now? You've been regurgitating the same infantile twaddle for about ten years. It meant nothing ten years ago and it means FAR FAR LESS than nothing now. Just get the fuck back to the 7 11, will you, and stop doing little bits of poo and calling it Shakespeare (or Cracky)"

You are not completely right with your interpretation.

>>3
Great. Well that's sorted that out, then.
And here I was thinking that the age of exhaustive, well-reasoned counter-argument was gone forever.

>>4

Alex, it seems you dwell on the hellbanned :8181 part of bounceme. Don't mistake the silence for absence of anything.

"why?" surely is not an entirely correct translation of "wherefore".

The question is: For what reason does Cracky exist?