>>1

>Most of them have just vanished.

Good for them. Nothing good comes out of being a "Crackygirl" (instead of a female crackyfag).

I don't think the community is active enough to sustain the needs of an attention whore anymore. Thank Jeff the Jeff.

Also, Cracky consciousness is probably dying down on 4chan, which is where most of these potential Cracky girls get their initial imageboard experience.

Also thanks to tumblr, teenage girls are now "empowered" from being more of a jerk than they have ever been before through rallying, echo-chamber feminism, so attention whoring has taken another route into attaining that resource.

>>4
"NSFW blogs don't reblog"

>>5
No idea what that means, I made a tumblr account like 3 years ago that lasted less than a month and never made the mistake of going back.

D'aww, neckbearded paedos aren't getting attention from underage girls on the internet no more

>>7
Isn't it ironic you are posting that on a board dedicated to a woman hundreds became obsessed with when she was underage? Take your hypocrisy with you on the way out.

I like how you have more of a problem with so called "hypocrisy" than being labeled a paedo.

>>9
I don't take your labels at face value. I was never interested in Cracky sexually nor platonic/romantically, and afaik I have never encouraged any of the "crackygirls" nor any other self-acknowledged woman to cam or share pictures nor information (that I wouldn't have ask of anyone else, like opinions or things like if the had a cat, etc.).

I think someone forgot that Olivia was and still is a huge feminist. Most of Cracky's pictures are based on feministic thoughts and ideals. She literally had blog posts talking about feminism. So if you're some weird anti feminist then this probably isn't the right place for you.

>>7
fuck off dolores
>>9
fuck off dolores
>>11
seriously fuck off or I will tell your religious group what you do in your free time

>>12
There is no need to be upset. Yet.
>>11
Who said anything about being anti-feminist? I don't know if her pictures / ideas were feminist or not, since she never said that specifically. Having posts talking about an stance doesn't mean her artworks and pictures represent those ideals. At best you are just inferring, at worst you're projecting.

>>13
Are you a newfag? She talked about feminism on her livejournal.

>>14
Did you even read the post you are replying to?

>>11

>still is

It seems like the person who frequently implies he/she knows what Cracky is up to nowadays is also the rapid ideological warrior around here.

So if not Alex, then... her mother?

.
.
.

Yes, I know, it's probably just someone who's trying to give their words more weight by implying they know Crackles.

>>16
Or maybe the poster is projecting their own idealism and believes that the branch of feminism they follow cannot be expunged and therefore remains forever and ever the cornerstone of their though process.

Different anon. But...she did say that her pictures were feminist? That was why she said she used menstrual blood. I'm not really a feminist myself but by denying a big part of her who is really the one projecting ideals?

>>18

>she did say that her pictures were feminist

prove it and I will shut the fuck up.