>>6 No, that is sort of overanalyzing it in a myopic scope. Anyone who thinks Jeff did wrong (it's okay to be gay) is blind, frustrated in a specific sense or maximal focus (or at a locally irrational "dilation" (pun!), or doesn't get the general byproduct of a specific action, only to get post-wise a specific statement in a place without necessarily having a post-general aspect. I understand this reduces context in a complex way, but ...