>You attacking the scientific process and not putting forth an idea which is better
Yes, because obviously because the one pointing out the huge gaps in your logic requires that person to fix your argument for you. Unfortunately that's not how logic (and by inference, your beloved science) works.
I'm saying the argument you use to prove your belief is unsound.
YOUR BELIEF MAY STILL VERY WELL BE TRUE BUT THE ARGUMENT YOU PROVIDE IS FLAKY.
Regardless, I believe you when you say "All I hear is blah, blah, blah." since obviously "[some people] either can't comprehend it, can't handle it,"
Oh, and
"Prove the flying spaghetti monster is wrong by becoming it."
That's not right. That's not even wrong.
"You see, I'm setting you up for failure."
indeed you did, Wile E.