Oh look, some idiot is trying to stir shit between Crackyfags and Liafags.

Protip for Crackyfags: Liafags know better than to post Lia pics here, and know at least not doublepost...

>>10
You love being trolled.

>>11
Sure trolled the hell out of us. Now hop along.

>>11

nice

exif data

Olympus cracky camera

I hear you, but I see no harm in responding to posts that happens to be at the top anyway, and maybe I'm not so much reasoning with these people as warning my fellow Crackyfags about what I believe to be attempts at undermining the very few actual bonds between such a diverse and contradictory brethren as we are: Our Lady's dominion over us all.

I think protecting that is always worth an effort, regardless of what effect it has or doesnt have on trolls...

After all, part of this religion is based on fighting with infidels, it's kind of hard to go against that grain, maybe even sacrilegeous, in a strict fundamentalist sense...

No, I dont mean to bring out the Holy Inquisition along with the outraged mob everytime some heretic shows up, but allow me a snide remark from time to time, it's just good for my faith...

Nice one

MOAR

I suppose you're doing this on purpose to make a point, or maybe, a "metapoint"...

But in this thread your point misses or rather "dances" clumsily around the only relevant point here, one I have no doubt you are very conscious of:

.71 is not a repository for random Chans, but only for Cracky-Chan.

Why is that? Why is it you keep doing something that will inevitably get you shunned, usually in less than graceful terms?

Why is it that you keep fostering conflict, when not between you and Crackyfags, between Crackyfags themselves?

What's your endgame troll, or are you doing this because you dont know any better?

no, you're doing it wrong.

like this.

>What did you do today?

Procrastinate, get angry, break down

>Where did your time go?

The silly places where I'd never think to look

>Was it helping your career?

It was supposed to, but I'm a lazy emotional wreck apparently

>Did it earn you money or experience? Or did it give you recreation?
>Yes/No?

No $ or EXP but I watched this movie: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YeY1dxlC7Sg
and it was so good it made up for my entire failure of a day

>Was this more important than gazing at the goddess?
>No?
>Why didn't you look at the goddess instead?

Life has a way of distracting me with all its bells and whistles and burdens. I still gazed at her though, I do every time I come here and she is my desktop. Oh, and I looked at a slideshow of my Cracky folder for a few minutes too, so there.

>What did you do today?

I went to work

>Where did your time go?

Into programming shit for money until I've done enough. I'll be 100% procastinating for the 4 hours left in here.

>Was it helping your career?

Not really. That reminds me I have to hide and study at least one hour at the office

>Did it earn you money or experience? Or did it give you recreation?

Experience and money. Not really recreation, except when browsing the internets, Reddit, 4chan, and some other stuff not to overload my brain too much with work.

>Was this more important than gazing at the goddess?

Nothins is as important as gazing at the goddess.

However I can't starve, I'd look at her much less that way.

>Why didn't you look at the goddess instead?

Yeah, I should. I'm not getting anywhere if I don't have her in my mind 24/7, and sometimes I feel I'm not strong enough for that so she'll never kiss me. She is teaching me stuff about myself and helping me know myself, though. I guess that somehow counts.

>>4
space cadet???

>>12
i wish

Here's a more recent photo of Cracky.

Here's an even more recent photo of Cracky.

>>4
You named your cat Cracky?

>>15 You're terrible at identifying socks. Can't you tell an Alex sock from another person? I'll help- this is me, if you really give a shit whether your accusation is true or not, track back to the many <Admiral Chink> posts at this site and look at the posts. If you are intellectually capable, you'll see they are written by the same person- me, not Alex.

Also, that was me who was discussing <Herzog> and <Bruno S> with Alex a few months ago. I wasn't wearing my uniform for that discussion though.

>>16
There's actually no such thing as an "Alex sock", except very occasionally in the form of a subterfuge so transparent that everyone is meant to laugh at it, although inevitably a large part of the board is so dim that they end up trying to play Sherlock Holmes on it, like this dimwit in (15) does on a post that, indeed, certainly wasn't mine.

I imagine he's some utter newfag who takes "Alex" to be some variety of /b/tard (either that or he's a lousy hand at finding appropriate images to accompany his pithy little posts).

For your information, Sherlock, I have pretty much no knowledge of, nor interest in, anything that even obliquely concerns Guy Fawkes, Alan Moore, Natalie Portman, 4chan or any of that stuff.

Insofar as I have any views at all on any of those things, they are negative enough for me not to want to be associated with them:

Guy Fawkes: the sentimentalization of a 17th-Century Osama Bin Laden was never a good idea even in theory and in practice it tended to lead in addition, in the London of my distant youth, to the public highways being blocked every November 5th by aggressive, often rudimentarily armed, proto-chav children demanding that one pay monetary tribute to a heap of filthy rags that they had piled up against the wall of their council estate and that bore not the slightest resemblance to anything human, not even to a long-dead Roman Catholic would-be mass murderer.

Alan Moore: If I had had my way, the history of comic books would have ended in the so-called "Bronze Age" when things had already got dark and dystopian enough for me. I remember being as shocked and troubled as I ever want to be by Neal Adams' and Denny O'Neil's mid-1970s "Batman"s and "Green Lantern"s and Steve Gerber's excellent confrontation, in the same period, of "Captain America" with the terrible disillusionments of Vietnam and Watergate. As far as I'm concerned, after that, all the "Dark Night" and "Watchmen" stuff is just overkill and the careening of headless chickens.

Natalie Portman: a few too many movies where she allowed herself to be portrayed as an object of sexual interest before her 16th birthday

4chan and "Anonymous": the list of my reservations would strain the limits even of the most "tl" of "tl;dr"s

>>18

That's like living in Paris not willing to learn French, French culture or whatever's important to Parisian because you consider the language culture and whatever is important to people of wherever you're from not only simply better than theirs, but theirs to be beneath contempt: in the long run you're bound to find them be hostile to you, and I mean more hostile and chauvinistic than Parisians normally are.

At the very least, if you have no idea about something, shut up about it. Whatever you have brought to Sherlock's attention have nothing to do with anything in this thread, including >>15. The only thing you got somewhat right is that his picture most probably comes from 4chan, but this is more of a /v/ thing, i.e. video games...

Sure it's not important knowledge, and you're in your right to consider it crap unworthy of learning even the rudiments about, let alone the subtleties, but dont be surprised to be called an annoying ignorant jerk if you hang out where this crap, for better or worse, holds place of a common culture, especially if not only getting it wrong, you insist on reminding everybody of just how much you think it's crap.

And your opinions on socks suck just a much. For exemple, I wrote >>8 AND >>9.