>>7

Olivia is fat

>>9
Well said.

redudge

Eugh

i wish corky had boobs

>>4

>>4

breaking news

she have boobs

they are small because she is skinny but personally I think she wouldn't look good with a huge rack. She would loose her innocent charm with big milky titties.

Not OP but I will bump out of my newfaggotry curiosity. Also, was this her home? I found the location some time ago in some thread on .71 or CH (I don't remember) but I'm still unsure was it legit information.

>>2

Yeah, that was her oxford home. Then she moved Gurnsey

>>2

yeah, thats the one

I am jelly as fuck

>>1
I dreamt about degrading & fucking my gf while she was crying. Then I woke up and we cuddled.

>I dreamt about degrading & fucking my gf while she was crying. Then I woke up and we cuddled.

Nice.

Fuck up about loli chan you candy ass roody poos. She obviously left to focus on better, more productive things. I wish I had the courage to do that.

Stop reading this shit. If you come back I'll be disappointed.

<3

ITT - Kathy pretending people dream about her.

and guy in the center?

>>2 And she is?

>>3 Russell.

black cock up inside camel's vagina

>>5

good point.

>>2 I was expecting a photo of somebody other than Cracky.

>>6
The original photo that post is referring to was not of Cracky.

It was of a girl in the back of a car, hiding her face with her hands.

Didnt save it as it was pretty obvious it wasnt her...

>>8

Ah. I thought somebody would have it. I usually save every Cracky lookalike; but then a photo without a face is not worth saving, I guess.

What

Awesome. Thank you!

As a misanthrope I must admit I sometimes fucking love you people here.

>>7

tee hee so funneh!

and for those innocent bystanders who are wondering what the hell this thread is about.

"The Ring" is a cycle of operas by Richard Wagner. It's pretty good stuff once you get used to the talkative style of singing and you can follow the story line.
One of the most obvious underlying arcs is how the gods, potent though they are, bring about their downfall by being idiots; basically having "flaws and shortcomings whom one can love and hate", whereas in the human storyline, they do nothing particularly wrong, being pious and heroic on every occasion, but being propelled by destiny, still have no other option left but to work towards their doom. In the end, everyone dies. Pretty classic stuff, but also diametrically opposed to what our expert claimed. And when attended to this error, got all defensive deferring authority to people (right down to a resurrected Wagner) who agreed with him (or more likely, whose opinion he copied so as to appear learned on the subject), and walls of text concerning trivia which had nothing to do with his initial mistake.

So there.

As for Verdi, it's a very different style of opera, but don't be put off. Just make sure to get a bi-lingual booklet (or libretto, as we Wagnerians call it) and follow along with the story. Once you start picking out the "Leitmotive", which are little melodies that are tied to certain people, object, or events, and how these are woven into the score, chances are you'll be delighted. In spite of its reputation, it's humourous, violent, and even touching at times. If you're not sure, just get the first part "Rheingold". It's short, and has a comical angry dwarf in it, especially if you realize at the end, that the whole goddam mess could have been avoided if those Rheinbitches would have shown our poor dwarf some tlc.

tl;dr
your retarded

>>52
To be fair, you might be tryi... pushing it a little. When you say that Verdi is a different style of opera, it's a bit off. You should rather say that Italian opera significantly different from German opera.

Apart, obviously, from Mozart who was on his own planet, and had operas with librettos in both German and Italian although that's not what really sets him apart, German operas are, as one would expect "colder" than the more sensuously "warmer" Italian operas.

Personnally, I find, German operas more boring, and static, than the more dynamic Italian ones. I said I only saw the Flying Dutchman, of which I only remember the overture, but I just remembered seeing Tristan und Isolde, and being bored to tears.

It's all subjective. It doesnt matter except to the person it concerns.

I like Verdi, Pucini, Mozart, Massenet, and I strongly dislike Wagner. There is a very strong possibility that I have been in a theater while an opera was performed many more times than anybody else here. Yes, even you Alex. My opinion on composers and librettists, just like Alex and the other anon, are still subjective. As such, they all are valid.

Alex, give it up, man. You are the one making it a "who's-more-cultured-than-who" flame-war, whether you started it or not, and simply because you've put in the most fuel. And you were already in flamewar mode anyway.

You can cram your second part back up your ass, aint no way no how I will ever have a civil conversation with somebody who has gratuitously called me a quarter educated cunt so many time, and who will not allow a different experience of culture than his own as a valid one, even in the face of the absolute subjectivity that experiencing arts should be all about.

You will remain in my eyes a contemptuous and contemptible man with a personality disorder, intent on shitting up the Crackyverse out of spite, and you will be so no matter if you are the most qualified person in the world to talk about Wagner, which I have no doubt you are not.

I'm pretty sure that everybody is aware that the only reason you will post again on this subject is to piss every body off. Hell, given how disruptive you have been those last few years, simply posting would do the trick.

So go on and burn some more bridges else where, it should be obvious to you that you are done here. Go on, give us one last blast of utter contempt and be on your fucking merry way. For good this time.