[Burichan] [Futaba] [Futaba Ols] [Gurochan] [Photon] - [Home]

Link
Subject
Comment
File
Verification
Password (for post and file deletion)
Leave empty (spam trap):
  • Supported file types are: GIF, JPG, PNG
  • Maximum file size allowed is 1000 KB.
  • Images greater than 200x200 pixels will be thumbnailed.

File: 1307484680354.jpg -(55592 B, 706x627) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
55592 No.1   [Reply]

Someone said LC's jawline/chin isn't manly so now you have proof.

98 posts and 17 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>> No.100  
File: 1308166268104.jpg -(86765 B, 360x270) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
86765

>>99

>under Fatty Arbuckle

Leave your sexual fantasies out of this.

>> No.101  

>>98
Yes, because its more believable than Joe Hunk, male supermodel sex machine.

>> No.102  

uhm, you wrote about how the the gods are boring and the mortals interesting, whereas the gods are human, fallible and fun (pawn your sister-in-law, to have a new crib build. Good thinking Wodan! Your wife's going to love it) and the humans just a bunch of relatiovely boring archetypes thrown together.

As for evicence offered, it's pretty obvious to just about anybody if you've actually heard it once meaning that you either never did, or you actually heard multiple performances and are too stupid to figure out what's going on on stage, so you just repeat what you hear from the other phonies who don't have a clue either.

Also, most of the acts featuring gods are short, whereas the ones with the humans are long and drawn out. Next time you visit a performance, try staying awake. It helps not to not be talking out of your ass when you don't want to be perceived as a phoney.

This is actually a good point to say "Well, I wasn't completely truthful when talking about Wagner's ring, but some of the other things I've mentioned aren't complete baloney." To at least try and save some face. Insisting otherwise is just going to be painful, since people might actually start checking the things you say and discover you for the pseudo intellectual fraud you are.

The more you know*

Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>> No.103  

>>94
Apology not accepted, as it was nothing but a preamble to the "why is everybody picking on me" Charlie Brown routine and another round of your latest flamewar.

You have been repeatedly insulting to ALL of the Crackyverse, every time one person, maybe the same, as said something you've equated to an insult, rightly or wrongly.

I dont care anymore, and there is no way I'm ever going to be supportive to someone who has gratuitously insulted all of us so many times that even a smile from him would now seem absolutely phoney.

I might have been supportive before you did start adressing the Crackyverse blanket insults but I never knew you doing otherwise. You actually started right on me the first time we corresponded, as I was trying to calm you down from your furor of the day. You then were incredibly rude and dismissive, coloring me ten shades of stupid, without the benefit of ever having talked to me, just because I was telling you that whoever you were arguing with at the time was actually pulling your leg.

So take it like a man or shut the fuck up. This social train wreck, just like the one in your real life, no doubt, is all all of your making and absolutely no one else's. Blaming this guy or that guy now is nothing but another cop-out in a long line of cop-out.

Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.


No.1   [Reply]

Everyday i go on here, there are less and less threads about 'cracky'. I mean, what happend to this community? A couple of years ago i remember that each page on here was bustling with talk about cracky. Now, not so much.

I would do anything to meet olivia.

14 posts and 2 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>> No.16  

So, one guy says he hates poetry, or rather, that quoting poetry is moronic, and from that we get that all Crackyfgas hate poetry?

It really has become "Alex Reynolds vs the Crackyverse" in your insane mind, hasnt it?

>> No.17  

>>16
Does that make me "insane"? "Insanity", I would have thought, would be a matter of proceeding in a manner that is not concordant with the materially existing facts, and "sanity" a matter of proceeding in a manner that is accordant with them.

Look at the facts in the case.

I don't think one single post among the twenty or twenty-five that have been made in response to mine in the last four hours or so has been supportive. Most have been overtly antagonistic and insulting.

If you look even at the thirty to forty responses made to me here in the past four or five days, I think you'll find just ONE that was supportive.

"Alex vs. the Crackyverse" - "insane"?

Show me a reality that DOESN'T take the form of a battle of twenty-against-one and I'll be happy to recognize and conform to it.

Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>> No.18  

>>17
So why are you here then?

You cant, after this, say it actually makes you happy or that it enriches your life in any way, can you?

Unless it's only for the purpose of winning the "Alex Reynolds vs the Crackyfags" war.

Now, that would be insane.

>> No.19  

I'm always amazed that I can tell Alex's posts because I get distracted at the half of any sentence, utterly filled with boredom. Its like he has this superpower of being extremely boring.

Now Alex you could put your powers to a good use, like boring the enemies of your state to a point in which they're unable to attempt anything against it.



File: 1308092125068.jpg -(16201 B, 600x450) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
16201 No.1   [Reply]
>> No.2  

http://195.242.99.71/cracky/kareha.pl/1307602937/



File: 1307887944445.jpg -(58326 B, 500x600) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
58326 No.1   [Reply]
12 posts and 5 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>> No.14  

aweo;fuyapw38ory2389056sdtuhvpse94ub2ethio45uf59bgy4e5otij7wbfg5yu9t8prtnm6908rj9pyv8n ovf;iw34890

>>12

you cant be srs

>> No.15  

more please

>> No.16  

>>12

Could she replace cracky?

>> No.17  

>>16

0/10



File: 1307801710158.jpg -(136172 B, 628x455) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
136172 No.1   [Reply]

Is it true that olivia is fat now?

10 posts and 2 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>> No.12  
File: 1307991863493.jpg -(35437 B, 286x480) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
35437

>>1
she could still be fat and a goddess, you silly

>> No.13  

>>12
It pisses me off that the very few genuinely witty people involved in this "community" seem to choose to post HERE - among all these "heresy" and "Holy Trinity" bores! - and not on Crackyhouse

>> No.14  

>>13
They may actually be the same, and you'd never know.

>> No.15  

>>11
that is far from chubbby.



File: 1307899826234.jpg -(21737 B, 274x480) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
21737 No.1   [Reply]

lol

>> No.2  
File: 1307902747817.jpg -(12436 B, 251x250) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
12436

I would love to get old with her... Spend my last days, on rocking chair looking at her. And even though she would be old lady, she would still be as beautiful for me as she was during the day she posted "sup" photos...

>> No.3  

>>2
I'd be happy to think that while only looking from afar.

>> No.4  

>>3
I'd be happy slitting your throat with a knife as you look from afar, so I am the only one stalking her when she is on her rocking chair.



File: 1220730737769.jpg -(203288 B, 900x600) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
203288 No.1   [Reply]

sage

>> No.2  

seems staged



File: 1307882530551.jpg -(21737 B, 274x480) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
21737 No.1   [Reply]

lol



No.1   [Reply]

http://boards.4chan.org/b/res/333747700

>> No.2  
File: 1307846964734.jpg -(81118 B, 480x640) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
81118


File: 1274107931944.jpg -(67105 B, 611x469) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
67105 No.1   [Reply]

This is now a board about Cracky.

27 posts and 7 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>> No.29  

>>27

Amazing to think that she used to walk down that alley...

>> No.30  

>>28

It's still closed off? I remember reading somewhere about it being known for a few crimes, fuck knows where that article was though.

>> No.31  

>>28

Hey, I've just realized they have improved Street View. Strolling through the photos is more continuous now, feels like an adventure game.

>> No.32  

Hm, it seems Bulwark's Lane was once a place called Jew's Mount:

Bulwarks Alley (off New Road)

The traditional link of the Oxford Jews with Oxford Castle is evidenced in the Jew’s Mount which was at the castle site. The Jews’ Mount was apparently a long artificial mound, though Tovey, a famous Oxford historian of the Jews who had first hand knowledge of it, also describes it ‘as a small tract of rising ground’. It was also linked or continuous with another artificial mound called Mount Pelham. H. E. Salter, the Oxford topographer, also adds that the term ‘mount’ actually meant ‘mound’ and that it was a mound of earth thrown up during the construction of the medieval castle ditch and, further, that by the 17th and 18th century all the leases relating to the Jews’ Mount, used the word ‘mound’ to mean ‘fence’ or ‘boundary’, rather than a heap of earth, and they relate that the Jews’ Mount was mounded (ie bounded) on the north side and was ditched at the south. The Jews’ Mount is cited to have been north east of the Castle Hill, in line with the City Wall.

Wood, the Oxford historian, held that it had been made by the local Jews in 1141, under the compulsion of King Stephen. Tovey, however, relates another local tradition that it is named after a number of converted Jews who were burnt to death for reverting to Judaism. There is no clear historical evidence for the accuracy of these traditions, though it is now surmised that both mounts were raised during sieges of the castle, which does link to the King Stephen tradition. Tovey thought that the name arose out of the Juis or pit at the foot of the mount that was used for local ordeals by water. Cecil Roth thought that there may have been a special fortification for the Jews at the site, as was the case at other castles – this is an entirely plausible explanation. Evidence of other local Jewish place name traditions across the country have frequently proved surprisingly accurate, but not infallible. Therefore it is possible that the site of the Jews’ Mount is an important link with Oxford’s Jewish heritage.

The Jews’ Mount has been supposed by historians to have been destroyed in 1790 to make way for the new canal and its termination at the canal basin next to the Castle site in Oxford. Nuffield College is built on the site of the former canal basin. However, the site is still easily identifiable.

Part of the Jews’ Mount was leased as part of the canal wharf in 1796 and it appears, as far as can be gleaned from the leases, that some three properties were on Jews’ Mount by the early 19th century. This is proven in a 19th century history of Oxford which states that the Jews’ Mount, ‘were afterwards built upon; and the houses in Bullock’s Lane, so called from a person of that name who built there in 1588, together with the canal office, stand on part of them.’ The 1923 schedule of the property of the Mayor, Aldermen and Citizens of Oxford, places everything on a completely certain footing, when it records as one of its entries that the Offices of the Oxford Canal Navigation was at ‘The Jews’ Mount, part of site of Offices and House – Bulwarks Alley'. This makes it simple to place, as ‘Canal House’ still exists and is now the Master’s Lodgings of St Peter’s College. Its back door still opens into Bulwarks Alley. The Conservative Club also occupies part of the site.

An examination of the actual site of the Jews’ Mount suggests that a possible section of the mount might be preserved under the path of Bulwarks Alley. This is because there is a distinct climb or ramp up to Canal House and then a slight incline down to the steep steps of Bulwark’s Alley which then takes one down to street level. The change in level is seen in the fact that the back door of Canal House is actually on first floor level and that the path of Bulwark’s Alley is contained behind a very high retaining wall on the castle side. It is more likely that this odd topography preserves a historic right of way, rather than being constructed in this fashion for Canal House.

Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.


Delete Post []
Password
[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] [29] [30] [31] [32] [33] [34] [35] [36] [37] [38] [39] [40] [41] [42] [43] [44] [45] [46] [47] [48] [49] [50] [51] [52] [53] [54] [55] [56] [57] [58] [59] [60] [61] [62] [63] [64] [65] [66] [67] [68] [69] [70] [71] [72] [73] [74] [75] [76] [77] [78] [79] [80] [81] [82] [83] [84] [85] [86] [87] [88] [89] [90] [91] [92] [93] [94] [95] [96] [97] [98] [99] [100] [101] [102] [103] [104] [105] [106] [107] [108] [109] [110] [111] [112] [113] [114] [115] [116] [117] [118] [119] [120] [121] [122] [123] [124] [125] [126] [127] [128] [129] [130] [131] [132] [133] [134] [135] [136] [137] [138] [139] [140] [141] [142] [143] [144] [145] [146] [147] [148] [149] [150] [151] [152] [153] [154] [155] [156] [157] [158] [159] [160] [161] [162] [163] [164] [165] [166] [167] [168] [169] [170] [171] [172] [173] [174] [175] [176] [177] [178] [179] [180] [181] [182] [183] [184] [185] [186] [187] [188] [189] [190] [191] [192] [193] [194] [195] [196] [197] [198] [199] [200] [201] [202] [203] [204] [205] [206] [207] [208] [209] [210] [211] [212] [213] [214] [215] [216] [217] [218] [219] [220] [221] [222] [223] [224] [225] [226] [227] [228] [229] [230] [231] [232] [233] [234] [235] [236] [237] [238] [239] [240] [241] [242] [243] [244] [245] [246] [247] [248] [249] [250] [251] [252] [253] [254] [255] [256] [257] [258] [259] [260] [261] [262] [263] [264] [265] [266] [267] [268] [269] [270] [271] [272] [273] [274] [275] [276] [277] [278] [279] [280] [281] [282] [283] [284] [285] [286] [287] [288] [289] [290] [291] [292] [293] [294] [295] [296] [297] [298] [299] [300] [301] [302] [303] [304] [305] [306] [307] [308] [309] [310] [311] [312] [313] [314] [315] [316] [317] [318] [319] [320] [321] [322] [323] [324] [325] [326] [327] [328] [329] [330] [331] [332] [333] [334] [335] [336] [337] [338] [339] [340] [341] [342] [343] [344] [345] [346] [347] [348] [349] [350] [351] [352] [353] [354] [355] [356] [357] [358] [359] [360] [361] [362] [363] [364] [365] [366] [367] [368] [369] [370] [371] [372] [373] [374] [375] [376] [377] [378] [379] [380] [381] [382] [383] [384] [385] [386] [387] [388] [389] [390] [391] [392] [393] [394] [395] [396] [397] [398] [399] [400] [401] [402] [403] [404] [405] [406] [407] [408] [409] [410] [411] [412] [413] [414] [415] [416] [417] [418] [419] [420] [421] [422] [423] [424] [425] [426] [427] [428] [429] [430] [431] [432] [433] [434] [435] [436] [437] [438] [439]