They tore it down :[
Well, I guess it's still Kowloon, but the walled city was tore down...

>>14
but you can still play on it on black ops!

apparently, according to the people that lived there it wasn't too bad towards the end of it's life.

>>1

Yes

AMIDOINGITRITE?

>>1
i see this everywhere. nobody knows what it's from. source?

>>4
I found it on 2ch.ru a few months ago and started using it as my default pic not related. It's started popping up a lot since then.

needs Tits

needs to actually succeed in killing herself for once

olololo screencap this and post it on your tumblr like you don't care, worthless bitch

Ewww no Becca, nobody wants your shit.

Amazing how... mean everyone is because she's 'ugly.'

>>7
She is an ugly person because of who she is. She is one of the worst people you will ever meet. Manipulative, greedy, completely self-absorbed. She fucks everyone see knows over, then plays sad little girl until some one takes pity on her and it happens all over again. Don't trust anything she says, ever. I don't even know why this needs to be repeated again, I thought everyone knew this.

>>8

She seemed nice to me but please do tell me more of how she fucks people over, I'm interested.

test

>>10

pretty

>>2

because I'd rather see old threads than another page of ordinary /b/ style porn

>>6
the bizarreness of what we quantify as mundane, as reflected in our comment, is ironically representative content for this board.
for instance look that the image in
>>2
this decayed old carnival piece, once was shocking, playful and fun, but now it is passé and neglected, much like what you describe as "ordinary /b/ style porn". its a poor choice of image to use as an example, as that one has been floating around for a decade at least, but I'm sure you get the point. a time traveller from not too far in the past would consider our attitude towards the content you hold in disdain to be fairly absurd. does that qualify bland pictures of topless women as appropriate content here? well, not really, however it may be closer to the mark than it seems at first glance.

>>7
meaningless

I bet you love the sound of your voice, or to read your own post over and over just as much as Alex does

go pick an argument on CH

>>8
Its not meaningless.
We're mental nymphomaniacs, constantly seeking to have our mind fucked in a new way and every increasingly bizarre new image we encounter we take and file it with all the other old material we've moved on from. The layers and layers of the odd at overlaid with more layers of the even more strange. They stack up like sediment at the bottom of the ocean and will continue to do so until what? Until we've seen everything? Then what? Why do we do it? Why can't we stop…

>>8
you're just close to minded.

Also don't tell someone to go 'pick an argument' somewhere else when all they did was merely comment on the underlying irony you may have missed as indicated by your acts of strong disapproval, not even just saging a thread and expressing your disapproval, but bumping other threads out of the way expecting it would make a difference. We can, and do, browse the back pages often enough when the front page is rather bland. We don't need your help.

>>10
what's that "we" shit?

While >>9 has shown me that I may have overreacted somewhat, the point remains that /EoS/ is not /b/, or even /s/. Those pics had no meaning here, and it is pretty obvious it was mindless trolling.

I reacted to a defense of that pointless trolling without even a second thought for the message imbedded in the defense. I was to quick, perhaps, but I dont really agree with the argument. However, I dont believe that that back and forth does belong here, even after calming down.

Meaningless may have been a poor choice of word, I suppose I meant irrelevant, but I stand by that word.

Go argue wherever you want to, but giving back EoS it's face is more appropriate than your arguments, and so is this pic.

>>6
how about this, it this porn eos-qualified?

nice combo, but I find 6-7-8 to ruin it a bit, looking mostly like plain old gore and abuse.

Indeed. Remember, when trying to be edgy and disturbing, nothing disturbs so much as the /implied/ rather than the explicit.

For example, pic 3 is rather heavy handed and blunt. The generic kitcheny linoleum is nice, and I'd keep everything in the picture the way it is, but get rid of the roll of duct tape. Replace with a clearly identifiable dog-dish half-full and labeled with some generic female dog's name, a few pieces of dog food scattered about on the floor either from use or from being kicked a bit during the fatal struggle...maybe some bruise marks around the wrists. It prompts the viewer to ask questions about the scene and fill in the blanks with their own speculation, that generally seems to work well.

>>11

Not my work, but thanks for the pointers.

sauce.

>>3>>4>>5

nice

>>2

not so good but nice

>>1

HAHA

>>5
wtf do you think this place is, flickr for teens kraving mutual respect? gtfo

>>6
shut up nigger

Dolores must you infect every board?

>>9
Do you know what Anonymous I do not think you are a very nice person and I wish the world had treated you better

>>4
Dolly still posts here? <3 lurves you my dahling.

>>11 & >>12
Thanks guys.

because