Posting mode: Reply |
---|
Anonymous
2011-12-28 03:42:46
No.
57
File: 248.png -(147065 B, 500x363) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. ![]() |
Anonymous
2012-01-02 20:17:46
No.
63
File: 255.jpg -(42349 B, 640x426) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. ![]() |
Anonymous
2012-01-03 09:42:18
No.
64
File: 256.jpg -(60297 B, 641x459) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. ![]() |
Anonymous
2012-01-16 05:41:34
No.
69
File: 268.png -(326230 B, 644x873) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. ![]() |
Anonymous
2012-01-16 11:51:41
No.
71
File: 270.png -(424024 B, 657x1208) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. ![]() |
Anonymous
2012-02-03 06:28:43
No.
94
File: 296.jpg -(101155 B, 720x483) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. ![]() |
Anonymous
2012-08-05 01:42:25
No.
121
File: 377.gif -(940829 B, 367x490) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. ![]() A philosophical zombie is a being indistinguishable from an ordinary human in every observable respect, but lacking subjective consciousness |
Anonymous
2012-08-08 17:15:44
No.
122
File: 379.jpg -(29082 B, 252x414) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. ![]() The sigil appears upon a diamond used to imprison souls in space, creating living zombies. Here is crystallization that is living death, dying from the inside-out, body armoring, ego-encrustation, crystallization at a too-early stage impeding further growth. For whom are zombies, but those who identifying ego with Self have forsaken childhood dreams, who have forever lost the key to Never-Never Land, that charmed inner Paradise. |
Anonymous
2012-08-18 17:25:36
No.
123
File: 385.jpg -(125345 B, 717x720) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. ![]() >>121 Zombiehood implies linguistic indiscriminability, the zombie tendency to talk and even do philosophy of mind in language indiscriminable from ordinary discourse. Zombies thus speak *Zombish*, indistinguishable from English but radically distinct in reference for mental terms. The fate of zombies ultimately depends on whether Zombish can be consistently interpreted. If it can be interpreted consistently, then zombies remain possible, but no test could ever reveal whether anyone (oneself included) is speaking Zombish. Any materialist theory of consciousness is therefore already a theory in Zombish, and is equally confirmable in its human language edition (applicable to humans) and its zombie-language edition (applicable to zombies). On the other hand, if Zombish cannot be consistently interpreted, then the zombies described in Zombish are logically impossible. Either way, the search for a materialistic theory of consciousness should be untroubled by the (possible) zombies among us. |