>>13
>>14

These Magic cards are terrible. I think the faggot who did these never even played the game before; half the text doesn't even make sense in the context of the rules.

Let's look at this, for example -- Name is "Cracky-chan", Type is "Asexual Glutton" (ignoring the fact that it's listed as an Enchant Creature rather than a Creature). Then the card text refers to "Cracky Glutton". Excuse me, wtf is "Cracky Glutton"? I don't see that in either the Name or the Type.

And why do we have and Enchant Creature and a Sorcery with Power/Toughness? And a card with a colorless casting cost & a Black border?

I could go on but I think I've made my point: this is absolute gibberish.