if you reject survival because we're on the internet, then you are misunderstanding your question. (1 life <-> all life) We are part of a system (living stuff) whose objective is to continue living, at first because it could, and later because the one's that didn't want to live died. To not let your species die when you are eaten, multiply, and be the best doing so. Hence, we have to die, since our successors should be able to survive (live) better.
Hence, there is no reason in live. Life started, and its just continuing because the ones who didn't want to continue, didn't continue (died). You could compare it to a row of dominos, where at the end the domino who's about to fall quickly creates a bigger one in front of it. So maybe you don't have to look in the future, but in the past. Since everything could be traced back using physics to the big bang (no, the first life wasn't some 'miracle' lol) or to what created the big bang, or what created that, etc etc, but that must be some religious thing.
Ok i think i covered all options. (BUT ZOMG NONE IS THE MOST TRUE LOLOLOL)