>>46
So you draw your line firmly at what is considered to be socially acceptable within the society in which you reside, i.e the status quo as received?
This is defined by... what, exactly these days? Corporate newspapers, corporate television and film, law as practiced, religion? I could cite you many examples of a preference for paedophilia in all of these socially-defining institutions, none of which would equate to the aims or effects of loli art.
Why do you trust social power-structres to determine values of aesthetics? I'm not implying you have been dishonest about your response to loli art, I'm curious to determine whether there are other forms of aesthtics that you might have been told are unquestionably "wrong".