>>50
Defined by law which may consist mostly of parents. I think they have more say-so to determine how to safeguard their kids than the fucks that come here. When you have to be in charge of safegaurding someone, I'd hope you would understand that. Such interrogative conversationalists we have here.
But I probably have more in common with you guys than you may think. You seem like deep thinkers and when I'm on gaurd a lot, there's not much else to do but think. Maybe you're kind of social outcasts, and I'd say I'm more like that inside. I'm a really pessimistic fuck, if you haven't figured that out by now. I see so much good in the world but so much bullshit as well. Underneath that shell of a man pretending to be conformative to society, I find myself asking some of the same questions and have that yearning to go against conformity. Individuality is lost in a sea of uniforms. It's frowned upon in the military. But I thinking like that is rather unproductive though. I'm here, got a job to do, and gotta do it. We're not all afforded time to think about everything and question your stance on every view.
But regarding the latter question, I really don't have any deviant aesthetic tastes. Pretty much any pictures are legal to look at in most countries but pornography depicting children which is understandable. Though some consider my taste in gun porn kind of deviant if you're not into guns, but it's art as well. A fine gun is a symbol of power, as well as the sharp stab of a witty remark can be powerful when given the right audience and enough of it.