>>52
Please don't imagine that I've been implying you shouldn't be here, or you shouldn't state your opinions, anything negative like that. I was curious to determine the source of your opinions in this case, and you obliged. Thank you.

In my opinion, you assigned labels to other people and ideas too readily, without either understanding what those labels actually mean, or an awareness of where your own opinion originated. There is nothing uncommon about this, but it doesn't lend credence to a position.

Personally speaking, I can very readily determine the difference bewteen loli art and ephebophilic pornography, and I enjoy them both. I do not respond in a sexual way to paedophilic pornography, and in the case of visible exploitation, I am repulsed. I do not believe that any society has ever been equipped to determine an individual's response to aesthetics. But I guess that was obvious.