7.

Neutral because I don't know much about him. I don't see any changes for the good (credit crunch yayayay) since he came into power and apparently he's hoping to pass new drugs legislations (cannabis from class C to B etcetc) which is a bit urgh. On top of this he comes across as unbelievably fucking boring, which can be good if that's being done to focus more on actual politics than public image, but he doesn't seem to be doing a lot of good either way.

finally an attractive OP image the pony tail look does her good

WIPO - this poll is a fake since it doesn't have Daily IMPollguy's tripcode

The Treaty of Lisbon, ratified by... parliamentary vote. So that's okay then?

No. No it isn't. It's a good thing I'm a criminally-minded subversive with low-maintenance interests or I'd be pretty pissed off at the cost of living spiralling out of control now there's no-one democratically responsible to control it.

And who is rushing in to save us from this statist suspension of habeus corpus, taxation based on apportioned spenditure, and the right to assemble outside of public buildings (all now legally grey thanks to ToL)? Umm... probably the likes of me, and I don't think I'll poll too highly in my current state.

>>5
I thought the pretty jailbait was his tripcode?

>>7
OH OP pic is supposed to be pretty! I see where my error originates.

>>5

Whoops sorry. It seems I have accidentally "outed" myself. Now you know my true identity: Anonymous.

>>4

Here you go.

>>7
See the best thing about this is in L's case it's because he's so focused on his own methods that allow his insane deductive skills - this makes this set-up look awesome.
In Emiry's case it looks like she just moved into a house and hasn't found a desk yet.

>>10
I'd buy her a table. In exchange for sex, obviously. I'd go to IKEA with her all afternoon in exchange for sex. We could have sex on her new table.

>>11

You could have sex with her in the IKEA store.

>>11
I'd buy her one of these and I WOULDN'T CALL HER IN THE MORNING.

But then again she wouldn't call me anyway. So. Y'know. Whatever.

I bought you a table, bitch.

>>13
See, if we use >>12's win idea, we be having sex with Emiry on a selection of IKEA tables, trying the out for Emiry-sex-ableness. Plus, we could say goodbye in the carpark and wouldn't have to listen to her choice of radio station on the way back to her flat, or indeed have to wrestle with flatpacks all evening. This is a great idea, let's do it.

This is now a harem.

>>15
Finally, I'm not the only person in one.

>>16

All Swedish people are now pervs, pimps or ho's.

>>17

What do you mean by "now"?

>>6 The Treaty of Lisbon, ratified by... parliamentary vote. So that's okay then?

Too bad your country doesn't have a system of checks & balances so prevent abuse of power by one branch of government.

In before "HURRR NO TRAWL MI CUNTRI GOVARMANT IS TEH PREFECT FAGFAGFAGLOL."

>>19
Yes, yes indeed, I agree. Although that system has been abused by the current US & Canadian administration to form the equally poisonous North American Union, so really all that's stoping a tri-lateral take-oevr of the global economy is the lack of an Asian super-state... propaganda for which is already being presented at the Chinese Olympics. There are very few places left to run, let alone hide. So it's sneak-round-the-back and loot tiem, fuck it, there really is nothing to lose any more.

>>19
>>20
you two oversimplifying isolationist idiots deserve each other

>>21

Well, you and your non-sovereign so-called "country" deserve each other.

Did you know that Europeon Union member states actually have less sovereignty than US member states, i.e. Texas, California, Vermont, hell, even Louisiana? And that's not saying much, since the sovereignty of US member states has been taking a severe pounding since the Civil War.

>>22
Oh noes! I want to go back to the 19th century!

p.s. You have no idea what country I'm in.

>>22
What? You pine for the ante-bellum days and you critisize the Westminster style check and balances system?

You make even less sense now...

ITT

POLITICSLOL

>>24 You pine for the ante-bellum days and you critisize the Westminster style check and balances system?

Yeah well your reticulation of coterminous parallelograms makes you celeritously adjudicate when you delope to eldritch autoclavical baroni. Enjoy your AIDS and fail.

>>23
Hai Obama.

WHY DO THINGS HAVE TO CHAAAAANGE

>>26

I don't see any names on those posts, so how do you know they were made by the same person?

>>14
Sexy

I liek civil liberties, so I couldn't vote for neo-labour after they introduced RIPA and things haven't exactly improved since then.

Pic unrelated