I hope you guys realise that by posting these pics of relatively ugly people where half of them look like children (and by children i don't mean "omg omg 17.9 years so underage lolol child child!"), wearing no nice clothes or no clothes at all, wearing ugly make-up, and making retarded faces as in >>26 , and most importantly, with no artistic value at all, you could just as well be posting pictures of naked men engaging in intercourse, photographed by someone who doesn't know how to take pictures, in a studio with empty walls.
>>12 is fine though, for some reason.
So gentlemen, please pick an image that is aesthetically pleasing in some way.
PS this doesn't mean i have something against pedophiles, ephedophiles, gay-philes, or any other files that might reside on your hard drives.