>>29
mhm this made me think.
Would you please do this test and post the results? http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/humanbody/mind/surveys/smiles/

When i was looking at this page, just after i posted, i was thinking "what is aesthetically pleasing ?" The picture of the james bond girl i found nice, but the one before it not. This may be because the good picture is better, but i also thought the bad pictures female was not attractive. So if i extended this further, this could mean that there are people who like looking at pictures like >>3 and >>5 and 7 and 9 and 11 for more then just a quick fap. A judging person would say "people without taste", but
mhm.. i don't have anywhere to go with this. Maybe i can use some democratic bullshit, like there are more ppl who don't like them. voila.
But no, >>29 , i think you missed the point. The point wasn't to insult your beautiful princess, but to make you see.. whatever i just posted in this post. So it was going somewhere after all. mhm..