>>13
That's not what I did, nor what I meant, which makes your argument a straw man.
It comes down to what is being discussed and what conclusions are to be considered acceptable.
The main flaws that invalidate Christian Theology are that God is presented as Morally Flawless, something that is clearly contradicted in the Book Of Job, and that God is seperate from the Universe yet supposedly omnipresent. These are conclusions you can draw from the literature of the myth itself, without the need to recourse to empricial observation, nor indeed can you investigate using empirical observation.
The fundamental building blocks of human reasoning are not science and maths, these are late-in-the-day off-shoots of theology and philosophy.