>>58

>"Science is best in areas where science is best applicable"

If you scrutinize something with scientific methods and there is an outcome there is no alternative by definition.

I see there are ares where this clashes with religious views. Currently, the most prominent one is probably the creationism vs. evolution debate. I don't quite get the point of it, because evolution does not rule out genesis, it just shifts it to a much earlier date.

Why do we need religion as an alternative? Why can't it just serve as a vehicle to explain the things we don't understand?