>>57

Yes, it says something about the experience. You're just so wrapped up in philosophy and the unknown that you don't know what's what anymore. There's no reason to think the mind can't be emulated, even if it is a simple mind of something such as a worm. A computer could perhaps be wired to let you see as though the worm would see, give you input which it may experience in one form or another.

You're basically telling us that things can't be interpreted. Language is a form of interpretation as well as math. They all take constructs and interpret them into something we can easily process. Science does the same thing. Feelings, sights, etc can be interpreted to other means of perception. There is nothing magical about this "way of experiencing" or whatever bullshit you call it. Maybe I could even get high and experience it, just like you.