That book is definitely not intentionally placed in a manner which makes it both vaguely innocuous but highly blatant. How dare anyone suggest that?

>>2
Oh shit, he reads books! Get him!

>>3

And nothing about that one particularly stands out to you?

Wish I could remember the name of it actually.

>>4
Yeah well at least I don't pretend to be a girl on the internet.

>>5

wat

>>6
Don't play dumb.

>>7

If you're referring to the trip, you've misunderstood, dear. I make no claims to possessing ovaries and am infact quite enamoured with muh dick.

>>8
But you post under the name "Lain" and once implied you were attracted to Suede. That sounds like something someone pretending to be a female would do.

>>8
and you like dolls?

>>9

I quite like Serial Experiments Lain and, dashing as he obviously is, it was quite clearly in jest. I don't see where the incentive or gain would be to pretend to be a girl on this site.

>>11
You could have people buy presents for you?

>>10

So?

>>12

Fair point, but I wouldn't bother trying that, consider that

a) I am currently sitting with £1200 in cash.
and b) I wouldn't imagine anyone, even on here, would bother buying things for a "girl" who couldn't give tangible proof of said girl-ness.

That said, presents would be nice if you were offering. I do have a cock though.

>>14 a) I am currently sitting with £1200 in cash.

You only have enough money to sustain yourself for a couple of months in the even of unexpected unemployment? That's not very good. And no mention of retirement savings? I'll presume you're still young, but you need to be thinking about the future.

>>14

>a) I am currently sitting with £1200 in cash.

Can I have it?

>>14
That was a mistake. Now you have to buy a present for suede.

>>15

It's a modest sum, but I can stretch it out quite well as long as I avoid impulse buying (that is, as long as I avoid browsing Amazon).

Retirement? What's next, a stable relationship? Marriage?! A respectable place in society? A decent house? A generally happy life? Speak sense, man!

>>16

I wouldn't mind giving you some if I could be sure you wouldn't just waste it.

>>17
Not that I object, but why?

>>19

Well, what would you spend it on? I'd rather not give away my money to be used for the purchase of vidja gaems or something equally trivial. Besides, you live in Solihull. You probably need it a lot less than I do.

>>19
shsh.. better don't object.

>>20
Suede needs monies badly. He's resorted to stealing junky typewriters from charity.

>>20
Solihull isn't as posh or rich as everyone seems to think. I'd probably use it to pay for this site, or for saving for a decent camera.

>>23

>Solihull isn't as posh or rich as everyone seems to think.

I know. It's the contrast to the kinds of places you're a stone's throw away from that gives it that reputation.

I'll consider it after I see how much I'm going to have to blow in this auction. Shitsux on ebay when it's not Buy It Now.

>>24
Yeah. Stereotypes, 'ey?

Buying something fun?

>>25

Depends on how much fun you reckon an umbrella can be. I'm rly tempted to splash out on the vidja and some moonspeak books as well though. D:

Mm, threads like this are why I'm going to fail this year. If only I had the courage to just go cold turkey with this internets business.

>>25
They really are in desperate need...

>>26
Is it some kind of special umbrella? You could probably get a decent umbrella for less than a fiver from somewhere like Woolworths.

>>28

A special umbrella for a special person. With a bloody special price, for a piece of fabric on a metal pole.

>>29
I'm sure the special person will appreciate the special umbrella, especially with the increasingly wet winters we're having.

Hopefully more than she appreciated my attempt at humour which prompted the need to find her something special.

For future reference: girls do not find fucking Bel Air amusing.

>>31
I always preferred Keenan and Kel.

>>32

Aw hell yeah.

>>33
Hahaha, fuck yes. But the only torrent I found had no seeds ;_;

WHAT THE FUCK

>>35
What?

Something is not right.

These little digital converter boxes, at least the cheapo ones, used to cost like $20 each. Then the US government started handing out free $40 vouchers for the boxes.

Now they cost $60.

Anyone reading this who supports government social programs... you've now been proven to be an idiot.

WUT? I just paid out ~£150 for a TV license. :(

>>38
Do you really watch enough television for it to be worth it? All I watch is the news occasionally. Everything else I just download.

Oh, and The Hairy Bikers when I remember.

>>38

>TV license

There is something fundamentally wrong with that phrase.

Waste of money.

I don't watch that much TV, but it's really not worth the hassle of not having a TV license, and then finding one thing a year I want to watch and not being able to. And I have the money.

Also, visitors tend to watch it more than me.

>>40
agreed.