THIS IS AN ARCHIVE OF CRACKYHOUSE FROM 2011-2012!

CLICK HERE TO GO TO THE CURRENT BOARD

Dear-Olivia

[Blue Moon] [Burichan] [Futaba] [Gurochan] [Headline] [Photon] [Pseud0ch] [Toothpaste] [VIPPER] - [Home]


File: 1328966801055.jpg -(84250 B, 580x333) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
84250 No.1   [Reply]
>> No.2  

Trying to make reference to social Darwinism?

>> No.3  

I can fap to this



File: 1329683319032.jpg -(49961 B, 540x718) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
49961 No.1   [Reply]

the necklace is fading, slowly decaying

4 posts omitted. Click Reply to view.
>> No.6  

she looks like a fucking dyke who kills cats. Do not want.

>> No.7  

>>6

may I inquire as to who the fuck are you

>> No.9  

>>7 u mad?

also, ad hominem. Who I am is irelevant



File: 1329723198386.jpg -(95085 B, 300x400) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
95085 No.1   [Reply]


File: 1329676669605.jpg -(254485 B, 535x2163) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
254485 No.1   [Reply]

hey guys



No.1   [Reply]

Does printer cartridge still come here? I have something he might like.

>> No.2  

hasn't been here since 2010 I believe. his real name is hugo though if that's any help.

>> No.3  

>>2
oh, didn't know he was so famous they made a movie after him



File: 1326225917999.jpg -(340896 B, 2288x1712) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
340896 No.1   [Reply]
7 posts and 2 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>> No.9  

I don't even like The Cure.

>> No.10  
File: 1329536749138.png -(78117 B, 357x319) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
78117

>>7

>This website is 100% legal! As we only host the images that have NOT been reported for removal. And to be honest most of this pictures are all around the net, we only keep them together.

And, of course, reporting the images for removal is SUCH a SIMPLE and EASY matter!!!

>We treat abuse very seriously. If you wish to report a copyright infringement you have to it properly in accordance with DMCA procedure. (http://doxed.me/contact.php)

What is the DMCA you ask? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Millennium_Copyright_Act

DON'T WORRY LADIES, I'M SURE NUDE PHOTOS FALL UNDER COPYRIGHT LAW, RIGHT?

I MEAN, ALL YOU NEED TO DO IS PROVIDE DOXED.ME WITH PROOF THAT YOU'RE THE GIRL IN THE PHOTOS, ALL YOUR CONTACT INFORMATION (NO LEAVING OUT WHAT THEY DIDN'T ALREADY DIG UP, NAUGHTY GIRL!), AND THEN NICELY ASK THEM TO STOP SLUT-SHAMING YOU ON A WEBSITE DESIGNED TO ALLOW PEOPLE TO SLUT-SHAME GIRLS THEY ACTUALLY KNOW.

I MEAN, WHAT COULD POSSIBLY GO WRONG WITH ANY OF THAT. WHAT MISOGYNY? HAVEN'T YOU HEARD!? FEMINISM IS JUST A TREND, LIKE SKINNY JEANS. JUST LIKE SKINNY JEANS.

Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>> No.11  
File: 1329552892285.jpg -(19275 B, 220x270) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
19275

>>10
As I said in my own post, I share your instinctual intense dislike of the website in question. The "complaints procedure" they offer does indeed sound like a cynical attempt to con the girls into giving out even MORE information about themselves and I'm sure whoever runs the place is some sort of despicable character who is in it, I imagine, in the last analysis, for the money (not sure how that works, but I suppose sites like that make a packet from advertising or something).

I can't see what good is served by dragging "feminism" into this, though. There are plenty of areas of activity still, even in 2012, where women are simply trying to operate as autonomous, self-directed human beings and are not being allowed to do so because of their sex or gender. But allowing yourself to be filmed on your knees sucking your boyfriend's large pierced cock with an expression of blissfully agonized submission on your face is not one of these areas of activity.

Girls like Kayla mostly did such things when they were very young, depressed, hungry for affection etc. and nobody should try to "slut-shame" them for it. But neither should anyone pretend that an activity like the one (a sixteen- or seventeen-year-old) Kayla is shown engaging in in the photo that opens this thread has anything to do with "women's freedom of action and self-expression" etc. The photo - like most of Kayla's videos - plays up to millenially ancient fantasies of female subservience and submission. Defending women's "basic human right" to do this sort of thing, as if it were comparable with the right to equal pay, or the right to be listened to in a conversation, is self-defeating. What the girl is doing here has to do with the excitement and the pleasure that arises from being DEPRIVED of rights and from being made LESS than human.

It's not inconceivable that that excitement and that pleasure COULD perhaps one day be made a workable part of a project and programme of human emancipation. (Michel Foucault was probably working in that direction, with his reconceptualization of the meaning of "power" in the light particularly of his researches on "the history of sexuality", when he died of AIDS in 1984). But to try to do that already TODAY - and particularly to apply it to WOMEN in their present situation - is an entirely unworkable - and, as I say, self-defeating -idea. We really aren't clear enough, just yet, about what exactly is going on in scenarios like those represented in Kayla's videos. Are her private, internal feelings as she does these things in fact nothing at all to do with the apparent feelings of sexual arousal that she projects? Is she prompted to do this by feelings of intimidation and need for non-sexual affection that the viewer knows nothing about? Or does she genuinely feel excited by herself as she does these things and by the idea of being watched doing them? But then, ANOTHER layer of questions: even if she IS genuinely excited "inside" as she does these things, how much of even that "inside" is something that the "outside" - i.e. patriarchy - has "put into" her? What would it really MEAN and TAKE for a girl or a woman to be "free" in these matters?

These questions - being questions dealing with the dark and terrible roots of human Being in the "foul rag-and-bone shop of the heart" that is sexuality - are MUCH more complex than the relatively simple and straightforward questions of women's right to equal pay, right to free speech etc. and to confound the two sets of questions is destructive, not progressive.

To call for a "banning of slut-shaming", indeed, in the way the previous post does is a positively ANTI-feminist position, since it implies acceptance of a culture that derives intense pleasure from actions like Kayla's on the one hand and piles contempt on them on the other. What we see in these videos, as I say, is nothing to do with anything that we can defend as a "right". But it's not something that we are justified in pretending to hate and despise, either. Precisely because NOBODY - man or woman - is "emancipated" at this point in history, we should admit that we are ALL deeply psychologically and emotionally involved in the universe in which the "slut" forms the central figure of obsession. If a girl adopts that persona, that should be no reason to despise her or for her to despise herself. If THAT were accepted, then "slut-shaming" sites would not HAVE to be "closed down". They would become celebrations, without cynicism or hypocrisy, of something that one part of us all already celebrates.

As I say, even if it were purified of the cynicism and hypocrisy, the "celebration" of this "something" would still be morally and humanly problematical, as it is the celebration of a "something" that is deeply entangled with violence, sorrow, submission and domination. If we find joy in it, we find joy in something torn and riddled by contradictions. Maybe one day, centuries from now, these contradictions will be resolved in a genuine emancipation and reconciliation of both sexes. But we will not build such a world by fooling ourselves that we have ALREADY as good as built it. And until then, the best we can ALL do, men and women, is have some mercy on one another in all our terrible confusion, desperation and need.

Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>> No.12  

>>11
lol what a faggot

>> No.13  

>>6
http://www.0chan.ru/g/res/41951.html
fuond this, it even has a link to the 'cought by mom' vid



File: 1329351453272.jpg -(2127645 B, 2736x3648) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
2127645 No.1   [Reply]
>> No.2  
File: 1329352243340.jpg -(619074 B, 1237x1839) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
619074
>> No.3  

>>2
[email protected] fatty in the background and her looking generally weird



No.1   [Reply]

I always wondered what is the story behind the phrase''Cracky is catharsis''

>> No.2  

Look up what catharsis means herp derp.



File: 1329169118090.gif -(93052 B, 560x373) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
93052 No.1   [Reply]

Alone with her is a film that made me wonder if anyone would do that kind of thing to Cracky.

>> No.2  

I would if I had the chance.

>> No.3  

torrent?



File: 1329232137958.jpg -(46971 B, 635x352) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
46971 No.1   [Reply]

http://youtu.be/hOnoPi_gOfw
HNNG

>> No.2  

Weirrrrd, she reminds me of Donna from that's 70s show, except ditzy.

>> No.3  

She looks like a mix between Hillary Swank and Olivia.

Her jawline is too manly imo.

>> No.4  

>>3
Looks like Cobie Smulders too.



Delete Post []
Password
[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] [29] [30] [31] [32] [33] [34] [35] [36] [37] [38]